The
Oxford University Press blog addresses this word in a forthright manner:
By way of introduction, I should note that, judging by the examples in the OED, the English C-word
was not offensive or at least not always offensive in Middle English.
No combination of sounds appeals to our prurient instincts because of
their intrinsic qualities. To shock or make us blush, they need a
certain attitude on our part...
...there are innumerable descriptive and playful names for the genitals.
Is our C**t one of them? I have looked at Classical Greek, Elizabethan,
Modern German, and American students’ names for “vagina, vulva” and
compared them with a list collected from the Samoyeds, a Ural-Altaic
people inhabiting the tundra lands of the north, and another list from
Italian dialects, that is, words used by people having minimal contact
with book culture...
The next part goes beneath the fold -
The most common words for “vagina” in the Germanic languages sound approximately like put, fut, and kut ~ kunt (u frequently alternates with o
in them). An unsolved question is whether they are in any way
connected, that is, whether we are dealing with some sort of rhyming
slang, taboo, or even variants of fuzzy-muzzy. As a rule, they are looked upon as three independent words, each of which needs an etymology...
I gravitate toward the conclusion that Germanic kunt is indeed a nasalized variant of kut (because of taboo or for expressive purposes). Given this etymology, kin, along with Latin cunnus, fades out of the picture. The origin of cut ~ kut may not be too obscure. It is probably related to Engl. cot (cottage is the same word with a French suffix added). Dutch kot means “sheep pen; dog kennel; pigsty,” and the English dovecote
(which should not be fluttered) belongs with them. Obviously, we have
here the name of an animal house, an enclosure or some elevation above
the ground. If so, our word may once have meant “hole” or “little
house,” both being among the most common designations for “vagina” in
various languages...
You can fill in the ellipses at
OUP.
I once read somewhere that is derives from the Latin cuneus, or wedge - ostensibly from the shape of the pubic hair.
ReplyDeleteIf it's good enough for a pint of ale, how bad can it be? (careful, even the url is NSFW)
ReplyDeleteOr how about the connection to Sanskrit 'kundalini' energy? The more interesting a word, the more explanations you have for its ancestry.
ReplyDeletestill giggling at the likely unintended double entendre of "below the fold"
ReplyDelete@anonymous 5:49 - my doubts about whether that was real or a spoof were resolved when I read the "how to get there" instructions.
ReplyDeleteah yes... the inspiration for one of my all-time favorite euphemisms: see-you-next-Tuesday!
ReplyDeleteIn my teens I discovered that Congress had the odacity to ban things like books and types of clothing. I immediately began a quest to find these things and get to know them (pre-internet).
ReplyDeleteIt was their prohibition that introduced me to Henry Miller and that experience desensitised me to the 'c' word. I still don't use it, except for reciting certain songs or poems...
Still, congress can be rediculous.
Some early "Just William" editions used the abbreviation "Cun't" for "Couldn't". Just throwing this into the mix...er, okay...I'll see myself out...
ReplyDeleteGermaine Greer on the same subject.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDJutaFuVD0
In Chaucer, the word appears in - I think - the Miller's tale (possibly the Reeve's) but it's spelled 'queinte'. That might suggest a totally different etymology, perhaps?
ReplyDelete