30 July 2011

A railroad train does a "burnout" of the tracks

The photo shows what happens when a train with multiple engines has the brakes applied, but an engine does not get a signal to shut down.
Actually, the whole train brakes. Every wagon has brakes, not just the locomotives. What is interesting is that somehow the signal bypassed the dummy locomotives (only the first one usually has people operating it, the rest are controlled by remote from that first engine) and got to the wagons, or the dummies were at the rear of the train and the signal broke somewhere in the middle. Also consider that static friction is stronger than kinetic, so as the first engine slowed and stopped, the following engines could have started slipping and never regained traction.
There's more discussion at two Reddit posts, and more pix here.

3 comments:

  1. Here's a couple of follow-up comments from the Reddit thread in response to the one you quoted:

    From Rounding_Error: It "bypassed" the second and third locomotives because the air brakes were applied on the entire train. This kept it the entire train from moving, but was not clamped tight enough on the powered wheels to keep them from spinning. The traction motors in diesel locomotives have a lot of torque at low speed. Suppose this was a 100 car train with three six axle locomotives, that would be 818 wheels with the brakes applied vs 12 that are powered. Even if the brakes were lightly applied on the entire train, this would likely happen.


    From Not_Mine: Actually there are 2 braking systems on American trains.

    The automatic brakes will apply the brakes on the whole train, including the locomotives. There are also independent brakes that only apply brakes on locomotives. When the automatic brakes are applied, the independent brakes can be actuated (released) without affecting the cars.

    One of the reasons for two systems is so the train can start pulling the train while the brake lines are being charged. This prevents the cars in the rear of a long train from having the coupler knuckles from breaking if the front of the train is moving at a rapid pace and the rear of the train is still stopped.

    There could be may other reasons for this, but I never had enough seniority to become an engineer.

    (Mel V. back in) So it sounds like there's more to it than the 'signal breaking' and skipping the dummy engines, there's a couple of systems involved here. Cool stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What happens when the train goes over that part of the track...?

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...