In conventional usage, "enormity" is used to mean "wickedness" "atrociousness" or an outrageous offensee. One might speak of the "enormity of Voldemort's deeds," but not the enormity of American accomplishments, which should be described as "enormousness" or "immensity."
The word itself derives from Latin e + norm, indicating something out of the ordinary. The dictionaries tend to give the first definition as implying evil, then offer a second definition suggesting greatness of size or scope ("The enormity of such an act of generosity is staggering" - Random House).
Merriam Webster online has the longest discussion of the word:
1: an outrageous, improper, vicious, or immoral actenormities of state power — Susan Sontag> enormities too juvenile to mention — Richard Freedman>
2: the quality or state of being immoderate, monstrous, or outrageous; especially : great wickednessenormity of the crimes committed during the Third Reich — G. A. Craig>
3: the quality or state of being huge : immensityenormity of the universe>
4: a quality of momentous importance or impactenormity of the decision>
usage Enormity, some people insist, is improperly used to denote large size. They insist on enormousness for this meaning, and would limit enormity to the meaning “great wickedness.” Those who urge such a limitation may not recognize the subtlety with which enormity is actually used. It regularly denotes a considerable departure from the expected or normalenormity of their situation burst upon them. “How did the fire start?” — John Steinbeck> . When used to denote large size, either literal or figurative, it usually suggests something so large as to seem overwhelmingenormity of the desert or the sight of a tiny flower — Paul Theroux> enormity of the task of teachers in slum schools — J. B. Conant> and may even be used to suggest both great size and deviation from moralityenormity of existing stockpiles of atomic weapons — New Republic> . It can also emphasize the momentousness of what has happenedenormity of the Russian Revolution — George Steiner> or of its consequencesenormity of the misfortune — E. L. Doctorow> .
All in all, one would have to say Senator Obama chose an unfortunate turn of phrase for his speech. He perhaps "misunderestimated" the complexity of the word.
Well, yes, I did place an article on cadfael.net for this topic.
ReplyDeleteBut if anybody is interested in the difference between hearing a story in church or in a local pub - I also go where blogging is a contact sport. The devil is in the details ? He is also in the comments.
http://activerain.com/blogsview/578291/Do-Words-Matter