Attitudes are changing. But very slowly.
For starters, consider that there is not a single self-described atheist
in Congress today. Not one. It wasn’t until 2007 that Rep. Pete Stark, a
Democrat from Northern California, became the first member of Congress
and the highest-ranking public official ever to admit to being an atheist. (And even he framed it in terms of religious affiliation, calling himself
“a Unitarian who does not believe in a supreme being.”) Stark was
elected twice after this, but when the 20-term congressman lost his seat
last year, it was to a 31-year-old primary challenger who attacked him
as irreligious, citing, among other things, Stark’s vote against our
national motto: “In God We Trust.”...
The Cold War changed all that. Atheism began to seem almost treasonous
amid tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, because
the Soviets were officially and emphatically against religion. Sen.
Joseph McCarthy famously used the phrase “godless communists” to bash
the political left and others he considered his enemies. In this
context, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed laws in the mid-1950s inserting “God” into our Pledge of Allegiance and putting it on all our money.
(It had been on most coins earlier, but Eisenhower made “In God We
Trust” our national motto, henceforth to appear on all bills.)
More about the history of religion and American politics at Politico
I'm sure it's just mean being an idiot and not reading the text before the graph but I saw the title..saw the results and thought...Why on earth would 94% of catholics say they'd vote for an atheist but only 54% of atheists!ReplyDelete
No, the problem is that the graph doesn't properly label its axes. Yes, it's percent, but it's percent of people who would vote for a (gay|female|atheist|Jewish|Catholic|black) president over time.ReplyDelete
I'm surprised it's as high as 54%; I thought things were worse.
im new to this and European. Im honestly appaled to this. When will the US of A finally exchange their ridiculous politics of symbolism with politics of realismReplyDelete