From the
BBC:
The idea of being fined for crossing the road at the wrong place can bemuse foreign visitors to the US, where the origins of so-called jaywalking lie in a propaganda campaign by the motor industry in the 1920s...
The first known reference to it dates to December 1913, says Peter
Norton, a history professor at the University of Virginia and author of
Fighting Traffic - The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City. That
month a department store in Syracuse hired a Santa Claus who stood on
the street with a megaphone, bellowing at people who didn't cross
properly and calling them jaywalkers...
The word was first used to describe "someone from the countryside who
goes to the city and is so dazzled by the lights and the show windows
that they keep stopping and getting in the way of other pedestrians".
The use of jaywalking as a term of ridicule against pedestrians crossing roads took off in the 1920s.
A key moment, says Norton, was a petition signed by 42,000
people in Cincinnati in 1923 to limit the speed of cars mechanically to
25mph (40kph). Though the petition failed, an alarmed auto industry
scrambled to shift the blame for pedestrian casualties from drivers to
walkers...
"The newspaper coverage quite suddenly changes, so that in 1923
they're all blaming the drivers, and by late 1924 they're all blaming
jaywalking," Norton says. Soon, he adds, car lobby groups also started taking over
school safety education, stressing that "streets are for cars and
children need to stay out of them". Anti-jaywalking laws were adopted in
many cities in the late 1920s, and became the norm by the 1930s...
The UK is among those countries where jaywalking is not an offence. But
the rate of pedestrian deaths is half that of the US, at 0.736 per
100,000 inhabitants in 2011 compared to 1.422 per 100,000 in America...
"I love how I see people getting jaywalking
tickets everyday at the corner of 5th and Broadway by our loft, and yet I
can't walk to my car without getting offered… any variety of hardcore
narcotics," wrote one woman in a message that ended "#priorities".
Advocates for walking say drivers are most often to blame for
pedestrian deaths and injuries, and that there is no evidence to prove
that anti-jaywalking campaigns are effective.
Related: A
Boing Boing post documents (with embedded video) a jaywalking arrest in Austin, Texas -
Jonl sez, "Streets near the University of Texas at Austin today are
safer, thanks to quick and effective action by the local police, who
caught and arrested a jogger, observed wearing a pony tail, black
shorts, and a headset in the area. She was apparently menacing traffic
by crossing the street in a manner construed as 'jaywalking,' however
her apparent arrest was due to her failure to provide identification:
i.e., she was guilty not just of jaywalking, but of anonymous
jaywalking."
- which leads to a discussion in the comments about Americans not driving a car needing to show identity cards.
Related is the very well done episode of the 99% Invisible podcast, "The Modern Moloch".
ReplyDeleteVery nice. Tx, Dan.
Delete