27 January 2026

How Minnesotans organize their ICE protests


Excerpts from an excellent article in The Atlantic:
(B)ehind the violence in Minneapolis—captured in so many chilling photographs in recent weeks—is a different reality: a meticulous urban choreography of civic protest. You could see traces of it in the identical whistles the protesters used, in their chants, in their tactics, in the way they followed ICE agents but never actually blocked them from detaining people. Thousands of Minnesotans have been trained over the past year as legal observers and have taken part in lengthy role-playing exercises where they rehearse scenes exactly like the one I witnessed. They patrol neighborhoods day and night on foot and stay connected on encrypted apps such as Signal, in networks that were first formed after the 2020 killing of George Floyd.

Again and again, I heard people say they were not protesters but protectors—of their communities, of their values, of the Constitution. Vice President Vance has decried the protests as “engineered chaos” produced by far-left activists working in tandem with local authorities. But the reality on the ground is both stranger and more interesting. The movement has grown much larger than the core of activists shown on TV newscasts, especially since the killing of Renee Good on January 7. And it lacks the sort of central direction that Vance and other administration officials seem to imagine.

At times, Minneapolis reminded me of what I saw during the Arab Spring in 2011, a series of street clashes between protesters and police that quickly swelled into a much larger struggle against autocracy. As in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, Minneapolis has seen a layered civic uprising where a vanguard of protesters has gained strength as many others who don’t share progressive convictions joined in feeling, if not always in person. I heard the same tones of outrage from parents, ministers, schoolteachers, and elderly residents of an affluent suburb...

“Overall, this community has exercised enormous restraint,” Allison Sharkey, the executive director of the Lake Street Council, which represents many minority-owned businesses that have been hit hard by the ICE raids, told me. “But we have been pushed, probably intentionally, towards civil unrest.”..
I went upstairs to see breakout sessions where people were being trained for direct confrontations with ICE. Inside a classroom, several dozen people ranging in age from 14 to about 70 faced off against three trainers playing ICE agents, in a loud fracas that lasted several minutes. Afterward, the trainers offered the volunteers a critique. One gray-haired lady said she had found the exercise difficult, “not being a ‘Fuck you’ person.” Others got tips on how to brace themselves more effectively so that the agents could not easily knock them down...

The nonprofit groups that run these training sessions are not organizing or directing the anti-ICE protests taking place in the Twin Cities. No one is. This is a leaderless movement—like the Arab Spring protests—that has emerged in a spontaneous and hyperlocal way...

Inside the schools, many administrators have been making their own preparations over the past year. Amanda Bauer, a teacher at a Minneapolis elementary school that has a large portion of immigrant students, told me that administrators informed parents last fall about their emergency plans for ICE raids by phone or in person, because they were already concerned about leaving email chains that could be mined by a hostile government...

Dan and Jane resisted the idea that they had become political. A better word, Jane said, was humanist. Their anger was unmistakable as they told me that the Trump administration was violating basic Christian principles. “It became clear very quickly that ICE is the Proud Boys, the Boogaloo boys. They’ve given them uniforms and let them run wild,” Dan said. He attended a legal-observer training—which happened to have been on the day Good was killed—and now the couple delivers groceries regularly to immigrant families in Minneapolis...

A protester had laid a rose on a makeshift memorial to Good. As Knutson watched, an ICE agent took the rose, put it in his lapel, and then mockingly gave it to a female ICE agent. They both laughed.  Knutson told me he had never been a protester. It seemed pointless, or just a way for people to expiate their sense of guilt. But when he saw those ICE agents laughing, something broke inside him.  “I grab my keys, I grab a coat, and drive over,” Knutson told me. “I barely park my car and I’m running out screaming and crying, ‘You stole a fucking flower from a dead woman. Like, are any of you human anymore?’”...

Many people are hiding indoors—so many that, in a city with a substantial minority population, I hardly saw any Black or Latino faces on the street.

All this sheltering has created an economic crisis that has grown worse by the day. Many immigrant-owned businesses have seen their sales drop by as much as 80 percent, said Allison Sharkey, of the Lake Street Council. Large numbers have shut their doors entirely, fearing for themselves or their employees. Sharkey called it “an assault on our entire Main Street.”..
Apologies to The Atlantic for my excerpting so much material (and both photos).  My goal as a blogger is never to steal traffic from sources; on the contrary I want to drive readers to the sources.  This article was written by Robert Worth.  These are his credentials: "Robert F. Worth is a contributing writer at The Atlantic. A former bureau chief for The New York Times, he has spent more than two decades writing about the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. He is the author of A Rage for Order: The Middle East in Turmoil, From Tahrir Square to ISIS, which won the 2017 Lionel Gelber Prize."

32 comments:

  1. This is an inspiring share. The people of Minnesota have shown America its collective strength, and we all hope to be more Minnesotan as things unfold into the kind of restless, far-from-finished civic uprising that has transformed frozen streets into a crucible of resistance + reinvention. More of this!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is the coming-true of that sci-fi story in which there are people and there are people called "Witnesses" whose function is to witness events and report the truth. Maybe by Ray Bradbury?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Robert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land

      Delete
    2. I vaguely remember something like this from Heinlein, maybe Stranger in a Strange Land?

      Delete
    3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stranger_in_a_Strange_Land

      "An example from the book illustrates the role of Fair Witness when Anne is asked what color a house is. She answers, "It's white on this side." The character Jubal then explains, "You see? It doesn't occur to Anne to infer that the other side is white, too. All the King's horses couldn't force her to commit herself... unless she went there and looked – and even then she wouldn't assume that it stayed white after she left.""

      Delete
  3. Let's look at this one paragraph: "I went upstairs to see breakout sessions where people were being trained for direct confrontations with ICE. Inside a classroom, several dozen people ranging in age from 14 to about 70 faced off against three trainers playing ICE agents, in a loud fracas that lasted several minutes. Afterward, the trainers offered the volunteers a critique. One gray-haired lady said she had found the exercise difficult, “not being a ‘Fuck you’ person.” Others got tips on how to brace themselves more effectively so that the agents could not easily knock them down..."

    I've been in protests with "fuck you people" and I can't wait to get away from them. I see no value in antagonizing law enforcement personnel or inciting a "loud fracas." It's too bad people are being "trained" to do this. No person well educated in non-violent resistance would find this hopeful. Instead it tells me how far we've gone in losing any grip on how to act on principle (assuming one has been clearly defined) in a principled manner. I think there's more of a psychological component than people are likely to admit. We can see how the identities are lining-up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please just shut up. These people are putting their bodies on the line to defend democracy, under a real threat of death, and all you can do is criticize their technique. They're not antagonizing anyone, they are defending their community from paid agitators.

      Delete
    2. We can't even agree on the facts. I'm not sure how you define "antagonizing," but I would include blocking cars, spitting on people, insulting people, "direct confrontations" (meaning physically interfering with law enforcement activities), using noise makers to keep people awake at night, etc. No one looks at these actions and thinks the aim is not to enrage law enforcement. To provoke. To create the next "loud fracas." To incite. Of course it is. This is not the way of Gandhi or MLK. Now, you may say these are old men from another time and we now know better. Fine, make that argument. Telling me to "shut up" is a pretty good example of the mentality I'm finding questionable.

      Delete
    3. And if the residents really believe that the ICE agents are "Nazis" or "Gestapo", and are indiscriminately killing people, why would they allow a 14 year old to be put into the situation? Sounds like they are trying to escalate the situation.

      Delete
    4. Marc B, we routinely put 14-year-olds through "active shooter" sessions in their schools to teach them how to respond to those emergencies. What is wrong with educating a 14-year-old on what to do if they are grabbed by an ICE agent (on their way to school or while playing in the street)?

      Delete
    5. I read it as they were preparing for direct confrontations, where the citizens were confronting the ICE agents. I can agree that training how to react if the ICE agents were doing the confrontations could be a good thing.

      Delete
  4. Who is going to be the first in America to say that "the emperor has no clothes" (or more like "this guy has severe dementia").

    ReplyDelete
  5. Job well done Minnesota.

    I'm fascinated by the rumors they're going to try Philadelphia next. That will not go as peaceful as Mpls/StP - which is what they want. But they failed in MN, so why would they think they can win in Philly - it's twice as large. And much more aggressive. They booed Santa!

    @ Crowboy: I don't know what rock you live under, it must be a pleasant peaceful place. It's not the grey-haired not-fuck-you ladies that are causing the fracas. As always, it's the masked dudes doing the antagonizing. And the violence. And the killing. Twelve times now.

    I read somewhere there using C2Cl6 ZnCl3.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexachloroethane
    From the link:
    “Due to its potential pulmonary toxicity,” zinc chloride producing smoke grenades “have been discharged from the armory of most western countries.” HC smoke inhalation can cause severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, and one study found that it can cause permanent liver damage. The chemical is a suspected carcinogen, has effects on the nervous system, and can cause sudden collapse and death at high doses."

    "Most Western countries". But apparently, not the US. Good job! Permanent lung damage seems totally reasonable risk for crown control.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. of course, when you reframe it to reality, that this isn’t law enforcement on a specific mission and pesky misguided civilians making their workday harder, thus they need crowd control measures, but that this is the paramilitary arm of an authoritarian government doing what they exist for – terrorise the populace into submission and stage an example – the choice of weapon suddenly makes much more sense. lung and liver damage isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

      re crowboy’s rock: it seems not entirely unpopulated underneath there. we had an entire evening’s worth of debate with some rando on a rock climbing chat server i’m on yesterday. despite being proven wrong with evidence every step of the way, he kept insisting similarly counterfactual nonsense that made all outcomes of the murders strictly the fault of the victims. the mental gymnastics were quite impressive, involving a driving maneuver by renee good that brought to mind the copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics.

      raphael

      Delete
  6. the rise of the new confederacy ... the demons will do anything to keep their economic slaves

    ReplyDelete
  7. Historically, the purpose of non-violent resistance was not to antagonize the agents of an unjust system. The purpose was to demonstrate, through intelligently deployed sacrifice, a commitment to justice. For example, the colonization of India was regarded as an injustice by the Indian people. Gandhi’s method was active opposition, through actions like the Salt March, which had a clearly defined purpose and utilized a disciplined, non-violent method–a method that extended respect to the opposition in all its forms. I see none of this in the current ICE protests.

    Firstly, are ICE protesters clear in their purpose? I can see that their purpose is to interfere with ICE operations. From this I can assume their purpose is to oppose ICE’s paramilitary-style culture or I can assume the purpose is to stop immigration enforcement in general. But without knowing whether it’s one or the other, or both, I’m not sure what it is; these are very different goals. Do the participants know? I think the public is confused and in that confusion there will be tendency, over time, to see the protests as an amorphous mini-rebellion with no sustained meaning. This was the result with BLM. Everything devolves to gesture, and sentiment is registered, without substance.

    As to method, is antagonizing ICE (insulting, spitting, blocking cars, using noise makers to keep law enforcement personnel awake, etc.) a non-violent approach? Not according to Gandhi or MLK, but are these men’s views a gold standard by which we must measure methods of resistance in the current moment? I would say it depends on some version of a moral compass, firstly, and secondly what we’re trying to achieve.

    I would argue that the moral compass of Gandhi or MLK points away from yelling “FUCK YOU PIGS!” at law enforcement officers. This is not a matter of whether it’s effective as much as whether it’s right. To the question of effectiveness: I have to wonder about the downstream impact of removing goodwill between citizens and law enforcement; that is, what is the cost? To what extent is what is popularly known as “fascism” being fed by those who claim to oppose it? That is, is fascism being fed in feel good moments of rage-venting-resistance while the long game of really working for justice is denied its focal point and denied the evolution inherent in methods built on decency.


    ReplyDelete
  8. I wonder how much protesters really love immigrants; is this their deepest motive? I’m sure there are some who love immigrants and even love the poor. Love the homeless. Love poor white trash. Love the white working class man who’s having trouble paying his rent. But among these protesters, were we able to dive deeply into their motives, my guess is that it’s less about wanting to defend the immigrant and more about wanting to oppose Trump. Or I should say more about a deep and seething hatred of Trump. A kind of hatred with roots beyond Trump. Roots that extend to a deep hatred of the masculine, lending ICE protests gender war intimations.

    ICE personnel are described, literally, as “testosterone” driven on NPR. This sentiment, that ICE is a male force–young men with guns and a racist and misogynistic bent–is widely held. Whether this is a reasonable characterization or not, the perception holds and makes ICE the enemy of a certain kind of person, with or without immigration as an issue. Who is this person? ICE is the enemy of the white, middle class feminist who is spectacularly pissed-off about the presidential election of 2024. This same middle class feminist sees the election of 2024 as more evidence that the United States is a misogynistic nation, a nation of male oppressors–with Trump as Exhibit A. The “FUCK YOU!” to ICE is a fuck you to all that has led this middle class woman to feeling aggrieved. Why not spit on those boys in camo? Why not find a sudden love of the immigrant if this will facilitate No Kings, I Hate Fucking Trump, 2.0. If the immigrant cause can act as the vehicle for expressing rage at Trump, men and masculinity with the cover of some kind of demand for justice, selective as it is, it makes sense that energy will flow in this direction.

    The white middle class and upper class feminist sees no advantage in finding solidarity with poor and working class men and their families: notice that all talk of "intersectionality" leaves those people out–that is, many millions of poor and near-poor white families. In this environment, there’s no way to achieve solidarity within the working class. The left remains rudderless in the United States. We’re a country that can muster a women’s march or even an immigrant’s march, but not a poor people’s march–not the sort MLK envisioned, or any other sort. To find solidarity with poor white people would be to betray identity ideology and its pseudo-religion, a religion complete with unquestionable dogma. ICE protests may give people hope. I’m more inclined to question motives and methods.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I wonder how much protesters really love immigrants; is this their deepest motive?"

      Maybe you could try engaging people and talking to them about what they believe instead of imagining what "the left" believes and saying all of its members are ignorant hypocrites.

      Delete
    2. It is true that I tend to extrapolate from my own experiences (engaging intensively for more than ten years) with homeless humans rights. I believe I have a decently well informed opinion on the subject of what motivates "the left."

      Delete
  9. I thought this article was so hopeful: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/the-neighbors-defending-minnesota-from-ice/685769/

    ReplyDelete
  10. Historically, the purpose of non-violent resistance was not to antagonize the agents of an unjust system.

    My man, Ghandi's clearly stated purpose was to piss of the Brits as much as he could without laying a finger on them. And he was doing so in a field of many others that were very ready and did lay their hands on the Brits.

    And as for MLK, you can google yourself what he wanted. He was not the moderate man that many now deify him to be. Google around a bit. Most of his speeches can be found in text and video.

    When was this historical time that you are referring to? Was that the mythical when America was great?

    Please crawl back under your rock. Because your babbling up there shows you're not living in reality. You're just projecting your beliefs. And the film ain't pretty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've read a lot of Gandhi. I've read a lot about Gandhi. I took an entire course on Gandhi. At no point was there ever any mention by Gandhi, or those who've studied Gandhi, that his purpose was to "piss off the Brits as much as possible." On the contrary, that was never his intention or method. If you can supply something I missed, which supports your claim, I'd be very grateful. In the meantime, it saddens me when people who have never read Gandhi or know virtually nothing about the man take positions which serve their point of view, but are devoid of fact. Gandhi would be appalled at what we see in Minneapolis. Go to the videos of hotels and motels being trashed, for example. Put Gandhi or MLK in that picture, as one of the rioters. It's absurd. Think about Gandhi or MLK packing a pistol at a march or any other moment of engagement. Also absurd. I'm ever more convinced that the left has lost its grip on critical thinking. Along with any regard for traditions that might actually be useful in seeking to make a more just world.

      Delete
    2. It's absurd that you're painting all protesters as gun-toting rioters. As usual you're painting a large and diverse group of people with a single broad brush.
      I think it's absurd to say that a man who was pinned on the ground and shot in the back deserved it or that all people from a particular country are "garbage" but I understand you have your priorities and will focus on what matters to you.

      Delete
    3. Gandhi? MLK? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuS8UQybIyY

      Delete
    4. That is very interesting - to see the situation presented from a totally contrary point of view compared to most of what I've seen/read.

      Delete
    5. with regard to the oft-quoted MLK as a shining figure not further questioned, there is also kwame ture’s commentary on his method to consider:

      ‘dr. king’s policy was that nonviolence would achieve the gains for black people in the united states. his major assumption was that if you are nonviolent, if you suffer, your opponent will see your suffering and will be moved to change his heart. that’s very good. he only made one fallacious assumption: in order for nonviolence to work, your opponent must have a conscience. the united states has none. has none.’

      raphael

      Delete
    6. @raphael: Beginning with Thoreau's Essay On Civil Disobedience, and running through Tolstoy, Gandhi and King, this question is addressed again and again. Of course the argument can be made that nonviolence is impotent. That the only way to make change is through force that injures the offending party. Though Thoreau took a different path, he admired John Brown. I too admire John Brown. But I find the notion that nonviolent resistance does not work and cannot work to be false. It has worked in many places, many times. In saying this, I'm skirting the question of whether something must "work" in order for it to be the right course.

      Delete
    7. oh, for sure – i didn’t say it can’t work, or that it’s impotent on principle. just that its falling short to just throw out the names of gandhi and MLK as beacons of peaceful protest, and that ends the debate because they are supposed to be the gold standard of how to protest. (that way would also lie statements along the lines of ‘well, pretti wasn’t protesting peacefully, therefore…’. and as nepkarel pointed out, it is also liable to reduce MLK to a more palatable figure than he was.)

      since the acute matter isn’t something abstract or remote, but a paramilitary force regularly behaving unlawfully to violate and terrorise a community, i feel it is a fair critique to bring up that the long game of nonviolent protest may be ethically unassailable, but the jackbooted goons are throwing people (including citizens, since nobody gets due process) into concentration camps now, and fabricating reasons to injure or execute people in the streets now, therefore the call goes beyond just opposing, it demands actively stopping it, now.

      raphael

      Delete
    8. @Crowboy I was wondering if you could tell me more about Ghandi, because I remember the crux of non-violent protest was to reveal the violence inherent in the system in order to gain sympathy (From MLK's own writings). Ghandi and MLK were able to gain sympathy because their non-violent actions were met with violent actions. There were absolutely people being antagonized (or more accurately their inherent hatred was laid bare), otherwise why would the government in either nation respond with arrests and violence?

      Delete
  11. I lived in Detroit in 1967. I was 10 years old. I didnt really understand what was going on. As I got older I came to understand a little better. I thought one day that there would be no more riots. But I was wrong. Certain conditions seem to persist.

    “I think America must see that riots do not develop out of thin air. Certain conditions continue to exist in our society which must be condemned as vigorously as we condemn riots. But in the final analysis, a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America has failed to hear?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Should have included the whole quote.
    “I think America must see that riots do not develop out of thin air. Certain conditions continue to exist in our society which must be condemned as vigorously as we condemn riots. But in the final analysis, a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the Negro has worsened over the last few years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of society are more concerned about tranqulty and the status quo, than equality and humanity. And so in a real sense our nation’s summers of riots are caused by our nation’s winters of delay. And as long as America postpones justice, we stand in the position of having these recurrences of violence and riots over and over again.”
    -Dr. King 1967
    The speech in its entirety. Love his lyrical voice.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3H978KlR20

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm reminded of how when we were kids we were taught of nonviolent resistors being driven by individual conscience and acting basically alone, with support coming later. Rosa Parks was just tired and wanted to sit down, etc. When in fact most / all successful resistors do so as part of an organized movement that carefully chooses which time, place, and person is most likely to succeed, and coolly prepares for likely scenarios well ahead of time.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...