This abstract from
Clin Exp Immuol provides a concise summary:
According to the ‘hygiene hypothesis’, the decreasing incidence of
infections in western countries and more recently in developing
countries is at the origin of the increasing incidence of both
autoimmune and allergic diseases. The hygiene hypothesis is based upon
epidemiological data, particularly migration studies, showing that
subjects migrating from a low-incidence to a high-incidence country
acquire the immune disorders with a high incidence at the first
generation. However, these data and others showing a correlation between
high disease incidence and high socio-economic level do not prove a
causal link between infections and immune disorders. Proof of principle
of the hygiene hypothesis is brought by animal models and to a lesser
degree by intervention trials in humans. Underlying mechanisms are
multiple and complex. They include decreased consumption of homeostatic
factors and immunoregulation, involving various regulatory T cell
subsets and Toll-like receptor stimulation. These mechanisms could
originate, to some extent, from changes in microbiota caused by changes
in lifestyle, particularly in inflammatory bowel diseases. Taken
together, these data open new therapeutic perspectives in the prevention
of autoimmune and allergic diseases.
Some other excerpts from the publication:
The hypothesis was first proposed by Strachan, who observed an inverse
correlation between hay fever and the number of older siblings when
following more than 17 000 British children born in 1958... The leading idea is that some infectious agents – notably those that
co-evolved with us – are able to protect against a large spectrum of
immune-related disorders...
In 1998, about one in five children in industrialized countries suffered
from allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopic
dermatitis. This proportion has tended to increase over the last 10 years, asthma becoming an ‘epidemic’ phenomenon... The prevalence of atopic dermatitis has doubled or tripled in
industrialized countries during the past three decades, affecting 15–30%
of children and 2–10% of adults... Part of the increased incidence of these diseases may be attributed to
better diagnosis or improved access to medical facilities in
economically developed countries. However, this cannot explain the
marked increase in immunological disorder prevalence that has occurred
over such a short period of time in those countries, particularly for
diseases which can be diagnosed easily...
Alternative hypothesis is the "Old Friends Hypothesis" -- that it's not being too sanitary that's the problem, but that we're missing out on the bacteria humans co-evolved with.
ReplyDeleteWhereas the hygiene hypothesis implicated childhood virus infections as the vital exposures, from an evolutionary point of view this was never likely. Crowd infections were not part of human evolutionary experience because they either kill or induce solid immunity, so could not persist in small hunter-gatherer groups. Epidemiological studies carried out in Finland, Denmark and the United Kingdom now confirm that childhood infections do not protect against allergic disorders.