14 May 2012

Islamic views of evolution

Selected passages from the Wikipedia entry on the subject.
Islamic views on evolution are diverse, ranging from theistic evolution to creationism. Muslims believe in a God as the Creator, as explained in the Qur'an. Throughout history some Muslim thinkers have proposed and accepted elements of the theory of evolution, while believing in the supremacy of God in the process. In modern times, some Muslims have rejected evolution, and teaching it is banned in some countries. The main schism between Islam and evolution is in the Adamic descent of human beings, a concept which modern biological anthropology rejects as mythology...

The Qur'an does not contain a complete chronology of creation. It declares variously that it took "six ayums" to create the "seven heavens [or firmaments] and earth" An 'ayum' is defined as a stage, or a relative quantity of time rather than a 24 hour period...

Certain verses in the Qur'an are claimed by Muslims to be compatible with the expansion of the universe, Big Bang and Big Crunch theories...

The Mu'tazili scientist and philosopher al-Jahiz (c. 776-869) was the first of the Muslim biologists and philosophers to develop an early theory of evolution. He speculated on the influence of the environment on animals, considered the effects of the environment on the likelihood of an animal to survive, and first described the struggle for existence, a precursor to natural selection. Al-Jahiz's ideas on the struggle for existence in the Book of Animals have been summarized as follows:
"Animals engage in a struggle for existence; for resources, to avoid being eaten and to breed. Environmental factors influence organisms to develop new characteristics to ensure survival, thus transforming into new species. Animals that survive to breed can pass on their successful characteristics to offspring."... 
In the 13th century, Nasir al-Din al-Tusi explains how the elements evolved into minerals, then plants, then animals, and then humans. Tusi then goes on to explain how hereditary variability was an important factor for biological evolution of living things:
"The organisms that can gain the new features faster are more variable. As a result, they gain advantages over other creatures. [...] The bodies are changing as a result of the internal and external interactions." ... 
Evolutionary biology is included in the high-school curricula of most Muslim countries. Science foundations of 14 Muslim countries, including Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Indonesia, and Egypt, recently signed a statement by the Interacademy Panel (IAP, a global network of science academies), in support of the teaching of evolution, including human evolution. Little is known about general societal views of evolution in Muslim countries.

A 2007 study of religious patterns found that only 8% of Egyptians, 11% of Malaysians, 14% of Pakistanis, 16% of Indonesians, and 22% of Turks agree that Darwin's theory is probably or most certainly true, and a 2006 survey reported that about 25% of Turkish adults agreed that human beings evolved from earlier animal species. In contrast, the 2007 study found that only 28% of Kazakhs thought that evolution is false. According to Salman Hameed, writing in the journal Science, there exists a contradictory attitude towards evolution in the Muslim world. While Muslims accept science as fully compatible with Islam, and most accept microevolution, very few Muslims accept the macroevolution as held by scientists, especially human evolution.
I find it interesting to see "Darwinian" theories expressed a millennium before Darwin. This post is of necessity a rather perfunctory summary of a complex subject, so feel free to add comments.  And see also "The Qur’an & Space Science" at The Turbid Blog.

Here's a relevant prior post [I really need to find some way to get LinkWithin working so I don't have to keep doing this by hand].

8 comments:

  1. Very unexpected.

    My hat is off to Al-Jahiz and Nasir al-Din for their tremendous insight.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You really shouldn't find it interesting -- the Muslim (which is not to say Islamic) culture was extremely advanced in astronomy, botany, philosophy, medicine, mathematics, and really just about any field that you can think of... until the Mongols knocked them (almost literally) into the stone age. A great deal of Europe/"the white man"'s discoveries were just a rediscovery of something the Mohammedians had known/thought for centuries.

    May I recommend the Muslim portion of "The Age of Faith" by Will Durant (a non-Muslim) for further reading? For that matter, I recommend the entire "The Story of Civilization" series.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you meant to say I shouldn't find it surprising, not that I shouldn't find it interesting...

      Delete
  3. Also check "The House of Wisdom- How Arabic Science Saved Ancient Knowledge And Gave Us The Renaissance" Jim Al-Khalili

    ReplyDelete
  4. If there is a god, I prefer to think he would be capable of starting the process of evolution resulting in human beings.. Why would he want to micromanage everything when he can start it all with a big bang?
    Another perspective is, what if god made the most basic of all, the atom, and not the massive things that are made from atoms?
    Excuse the rambling here..

    ReplyDelete
  5. My comment echoes that of Phil F. The Muslims were the only source of advanced scientific and mathematical learning in the western hemisphere during Europe's Dark Ages. With the exception of Spain, of course, which was under Muslim rule from 711 until the 12th Century, when the Spanish began to expel Muslims. So many of our scientific and mathematical terms come from Arabic, as well as the names of most of the stars.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've just happened along your very interesting eclectic blog. It's good to see some acknowledgement of the contribution of Islamic thinkers to the historical underpinnings of science. One addition to your comments on Islamic attitudes to evolution might be the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam who have promoted modern evolutionary theory in it’s entirety, albeit with a deist style interpretation). Consequently, they're not exactly flavour of the month with the current fundamentalist ethos.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...