Phil Zuckerman spent 14 months in Scandinavia, talking to hundreds of Danes and Swedes about religion. It wasn’t easy..More at the link. Zuckerman's book is “Society Without God” (New York University Press, 2008). I have it on request from our library - will leave a followup later.
...the assumption of many Americans [is] that a society where religion is minimal would be, in Mr. Zuckerman’s words, “rampant with immorality, full of evil and teeming with depravity.”...what he and his wife and children experienced was quite the opposite: “a society — a markedly irreligious society — that was, above all, moral, stable, humane and deeply good.”
The many nonbelievers he interviewed... were anything but antireligious. They typically balked at the label “atheist.” An overwhelming majority had in fact been baptized, and many had been confirmed or married in church...
And he concluded that “religion wasn’t really so much a private, personal issue, but rather, a nonissue.” His interviewees just didn’t care about it...
Thoughtful, well-educated Danes and Swedes reacted to Mr. Zuckerman’s basic questions about God, Jesus, death and so on as completely novel. “I really have never thought about that,” one of his interviewees answered, adding, “It’s been fun to get these kinds of questions that I never, never think about.”
...Mr. Zuckerman was deeply impressed with the matter-of-fact way in which many of his interviewees spoke of death, without fear or anxiety, and their notable lack of existential searching for any ultimate meaning of life.
The interviewees affirmed a Christianity that seems to have everything to do with “holidays, songs, stories and food” but little to do with God or Creed, everything to do with rituals marking important passages in life but little to do with the religious meaning of those rituals...
“We are Lutherans in our souls — I’m an atheist, but still have the Lutheran perceptions of many: to help your neighbor. Yeah. It’s an old, good, moral thought.”
04 March 2009
Being "nonreligious" is not the same as being "immoral"
There is a very interesting article at the New York Times today, in which a writer tries to come to terms with the well-known fact that Scandinavians are among the "least religious" people on a variety of surveys. Herewith some excerpts:
I do not understand the belief that religion is necessary for morality, right action, or decency. Some of the most offensive people I know loudly proclaim they are Christian.
ReplyDeleteHistory tells us that religion for the most part has been anti-moral, used to control the masses through fear, to gain wealth and power.
ReplyDeleteI'd go a bit further than the last 2 comments, and say that people who don't blindly follow a moral code have to think about morality a lot more, and so it only makes sense that they often have a better understanding of morals...
ReplyDelete