09 June 2026

College students who cannot read

Excerpt from an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education:
"Six weeks into the term, I assigned my rhetoric and writing students a 20-page article. It was the same length I had assigned for five years and the same length I had read without complaint as an undergraduate a decade ago. Not one student finished it.

When I asked why, a student answered honestly: It was too long, and she kept losing track of what the paper was about. This was not a remedial class: These were students who had cleared the admissions process and written essays good enough to get them here. Yet a routine academic reading assignment had defeated them.

Every generation of professors has complained that their students cannot read. The lament is usually overblown, but data have caught up to anecdote, and what I am seeing in my classroom is no longer a hunch. There is a measurable, generational collapse in sustained reading and writing, and the academy is responding to it with improvisation and exhaustion rather than the structural overhaul it requires.

In February 2024, Adam Kotsko, who teaches in the Shimer Great Books School at North Central College, wrote in Slate that students who once handled 30 pages of reading per class meeting now seem “intimidated by anything over 10 pages and seem to walk away from readings of as little as 20 pages with no real understanding.” Crucially, he added that this is “not a matter of laziness on the part of the students” but of underlying skills they were never given a chance to build.

The Chronicle of Higher Education’s 2024 investigation found the same pattern across institutions as different as the Stevens Institute of Technology and Wellesley College, where the average SAT exceeds 1400. Nicholaus Gutierrez, an assistant professor at Wellesley, told The Chronicle that the baseline for what students consider a reasonable amount of work has dropped so noticeably that he has cut his readings accordingly; a 750-word essay now strikes many students as long. At Stevens, the science and technology studies associate professor Theresa MacPhail described following the mantra of “meet your students where they are” for so long that she has begun to feel “like a cruise director organizing games of shuffleboard.”

Worse, the national data tell the same story in colder language. On the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) writing assessment, which is the most recent comprehensive writing benchmark, only 24 percent of 12th graders reached the Proficient level, and just 3 percent reached Advanced; another 21 percent scored below Basic. The reading side of the ledger is worse, and getting worse fast: The 2024 NAEP results released in September 2025 show 12th-grade reading scores at the lowest level recorded since the assessment began in 1992. Thirty-two percent of 12th graders now score below NAEP Basic in reading, meaning that, in the assessment’s own language, they likely “cannot draw general conclusions based on concepts presented explicitly in a text.” And yet more than half of these same seniors reported being accepted to a four-year college. That last sentence is the whole problem in one line: We are admitting a cohort that cannot read at a college level and are pretending otherwise.
Longread at the link.

18 comments:

  1. This posting is too long - for college students, that is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I came here to post "tl;dr :D"
      You beat me to it.

      Delete
  2. Perhaps all the kids these days have Presidential ambitions?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm curious whether this is a COVID generation that's reaching college, or whether it's due to social media being so short-attention span.

    Or whether this is because they've been taught how to read wrong.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGsNcFfezLM

    ReplyDelete
  4. Extrapolate this issue to professional schools, and we must consider an entirely more dangerous problem: We will have medical students who cannot master the material, leading to doctors who cannot diagnose or treat. We will have lawyers who do not know or understand the law; engineers who cannot build safe structures; pilots who cannot safely fly planes; etc.
    It's an absolute recipe for disaster, and no one is stepping up fast enough to fix it...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are already seeing those things. The US medical system is a joke, the legal system is full of incompetents on both sides, and our infrastructure is failing on a massive scale with no one who knows how to do anything about it. In short, this isn't a new problem; it's one that's been around for so long that the effects can no longer be ignored.

      Delete
    2. And yet, we will continue to ignore them…. I have given up hope that we will address any of the overarching current problems. Our president is a moron and greed seems to be the driving force behind everything. I’m old and a retired librarian who left because of the quality of college students coupled with onslaught of AI. I do worry about the future for my child but afraid it’s just going to continue to get worse

      Delete
    3. And yet, we will continue to ignore them…. I have given up hope that we will address any of the overarching current problems. Our president is a moron and greed seems to be the driving force behind everything. I’m old and a retired librarian who left because of the quality of college students coupled with onslaught of AI. I do worry about the future for my child but afraid it’s just going to continue to get worse

      Delete
  5. i read that article just the other day – even if its focus is regionally specific to the US and some factors don’t apply 1:1 to other places (like common core, testing culture, three-cueing as an approach to reading), the overall trend is massively sobering.

    over here in germany, the last big driver of change in uni students’ aptitude before the advent of LLMs was a reduction of school from 13 years to 12. so departments were faced with a sudden influx of kids that had been hurried through a more compressed curriculum, and also were just a whole year younger. some had to bring their parents to sign forms because they weren’t 18 yet.

    as a rule, trying to skimp on education (including trying to streamline it) comes with a very expensive bill sooner than one would like.

    raphael

    ReplyDelete
  6. There's a joke going around the internet that if someone writing a speculative fiction novel included a language that many people learn as a second language, usually for professional reasons, that has a spelling system so awful that spelling words correctly is actually a high-stakes broadcast competition everyone would dismiss it as completely implausible.
    Granted I also remember a French cartoon in one of my linguistics textbooks. A young boy with a grammar book is looking imploringly at an old man who's saying, "I'm sorry grandson, I don't understand the past imperfect subjunctive either."

    ReplyDelete
  7. I taught at the local community college for 12 years. I quit because the onus was on the instructors for the students to pass, but no requirement of the students to do the work. The mantra "butts in seats" was offensive to me.
    One student reported me to the Dean because I suggested they put a dictionary in their bathroom since they're going to be sitting there at least once a day.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This feels like the crux of the problem. If classes went on exactly like they had for decades before and it was up to the students to adapt or fail, then most students would adapt. In America you could just charge them for a couple of years of "pre-college" where you take their phones away, house them in prisons and make them sew mail sacks all day with only a trolley full of dog-eared books as entertainment in the evening. Like I said, they'd adapt.

      Always a sound reason to keep children off social media. And by children I mean everyone.

      Delete
  8. This is what American parents wanted and this is what America got: Daycare-like activities rewarding mediocrity to boost parents' egos while diminishing primary and secondary-level educational standards to less than measurable. I have been a high school ELA teacher for 30+ years (both in the USA and abroad) and the current state of things is not a surprise. Remember: An ignorant populace is often an easily manipulated populace. Things are the way they are now for a reason.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The ancient Greeks were faced with a similar problem. From Cicero -"O tempora! O mores!"
    A more modern take on this would be - "I don't know what's wrong with kids nowadays"

    Times change, but old folks don't.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Digitalization has made everything quick and bite-sized. Even I, who am an avid reader, find myself endlessly scrolling just to pick up snippets of things here and there. There is no longer that sustained and longer reading "gene" active, it seems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I haunt a few fiction sub-Reddits and more often than not (literally) when talking about reading the young people mean listening to audiobooks.

      Delete
  11. I do wonder how much of all this is just generational. I remember my, erm 'venerable' aged Contracts professor in law school fifteen years ago addressing an unprepared classmate: "YOU'VE GOT TO LEARN TO READ!!!! How can you expect to practice law if you can't READ!!!"

    He was great for quotes. My favorite being "Computer ain't nothing on the steam engine!"

    ReplyDelete