Excerpts from an excellent article in The Atlantic:
(B)ehind the violence in Minneapolis—captured in so many chilling photographs in recent weeks—is a different reality: a meticulous urban choreography of civic protest. You could see traces of it in the identical whistles the protesters used, in their chants, in their tactics, in the way they followed ICE agents but never actually blocked them from detaining people. Thousands of Minnesotans have been trained over the past year as legal observers and have taken part in lengthy role-playing exercises where they rehearse scenes exactly like the one I witnessed. They patrol neighborhoods day and night on foot and stay connected on encrypted apps such as Signal, in networks that were first formed after the 2020 killing of George Floyd.Again and again, I heard people say they were not protesters but protectors—of their communities, of their values, of the Constitution. Vice President Vance has decried the protests as “engineered chaos” produced by far-left activists working in tandem with local authorities. But the reality on the ground is both stranger and more interesting. The movement has grown much larger than the core of activists shown on TV newscasts, especially since the killing of Renee Good on January 7. And it lacks the sort of central direction that Vance and other administration officials seem to imagine.At times, Minneapolis reminded me of what I saw during the Arab Spring in 2011, a series of street clashes between protesters and police that quickly swelled into a much larger struggle against autocracy. As in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, Minneapolis has seen a layered civic uprising where a vanguard of protesters has gained strength as many others who don’t share progressive convictions joined in feeling, if not always in person. I heard the same tones of outrage from parents, ministers, schoolteachers, and elderly residents of an affluent suburb...“Overall, this community has exercised enormous restraint,” Allison Sharkey, the executive director of the Lake Street Council, which represents many minority-owned businesses that have been hit hard by the ICE raids, told me. “But we have been pushed, probably intentionally, towards civil unrest.”..
I went upstairs to see breakout sessions where people were being trained for direct confrontations with ICE. Inside a classroom, several dozen people ranging in age from 14 to about 70 faced off against three trainers playing ICE agents, in a loud fracas that lasted several minutes. Afterward, the trainers offered the volunteers a critique. One gray-haired lady said she had found the exercise difficult, “not being a ‘Fuck you’ person.” Others got tips on how to brace themselves more effectively so that the agents could not easily knock them down...The nonprofit groups that run these training sessions are not organizing or directing the anti-ICE protests taking place in the Twin Cities. No one is. This is a leaderless movement—like the Arab Spring protests—that has emerged in a spontaneous and hyperlocal way...Inside the schools, many administrators have been making their own preparations over the past year. Amanda Bauer, a teacher at a Minneapolis elementary school that has a large portion of immigrant students, told me that administrators informed parents last fall about their emergency plans for ICE raids by phone or in person, because they were already concerned about leaving email chains that could be mined by a hostile government...Dan and Jane resisted the idea that they had become political. A better word, Jane said, was humanist. Their anger was unmistakable as they told me that the Trump administration was violating basic Christian principles. “It became clear very quickly that ICE is the Proud Boys, the Boogaloo boys. They’ve given them uniforms and let them run wild,” Dan said. He attended a legal-observer training—which happened to have been on the day Good was killed—and now the couple delivers groceries regularly to immigrant families in Minneapolis...A protester had laid a rose on a makeshift memorial to Good. As Knutson watched, an ICE agent took the rose, put it in his lapel, and then mockingly gave it to a female ICE agent. They both laughed. Knutson told me he had never been a protester. It seemed pointless, or just a way for people to expiate their sense of guilt. But when he saw those ICE agents laughing, something broke inside him. “I grab my keys, I grab a coat, and drive over,” Knutson told me. “I barely park my car and I’m running out screaming and crying, ‘You stole a fucking flower from a dead woman. Like, are any of you human anymore?’”...Many people are hiding indoors—so many that, in a city with a substantial minority population, I hardly saw any Black or Latino faces on the street.All this sheltering has created an economic crisis that has grown worse by the day. Many immigrant-owned businesses have seen their sales drop by as much as 80 percent, said Allison Sharkey, of the Lake Street Council. Large numbers have shut their doors entirely, fearing for themselves or their employees. Sharkey called it “an assault on our entire Main Street.”..
Apologies to The Atlantic for my excerpting so much material (and both photos). My goal as a blogger is never to steal traffic from sources; on the contrary I want to drive readers to the sources. This article was written by Robert Worth. These are his credentials: "Robert F. Worth is a contributing writer at The Atlantic. A former bureau chief for The New York Times, he has spent more than two decades writing about the Middle East, Europe, and Asia. He is the author of A Rage for Order: The Middle East in Turmoil, From Tahrir Square to ISIS, which won the 2017 Lionel Gelber Prize."


This is an inspiring share. The people of Minnesota have shown America its collective strength, and we all hope to be more Minnesotan as things unfold into the kind of restless, far-from-finished civic uprising that has transformed frozen streets into a crucible of resistance + reinvention. More of this!
ReplyDeleteThis is the coming-true of that sci-fi story in which there are people and there are people called "Witnesses" whose function is to witness events and report the truth. Maybe by Ray Bradbury?
ReplyDeleteRobert A. Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land
DeleteI vaguely remember something like this from Heinlein, maybe Stranger in a Strange Land?
Deletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stranger_in_a_Strange_Land
Delete"An example from the book illustrates the role of Fair Witness when Anne is asked what color a house is. She answers, "It's white on this side." The character Jubal then explains, "You see? It doesn't occur to Anne to infer that the other side is white, too. All the King's horses couldn't force her to commit herself... unless she went there and looked – and even then she wouldn't assume that it stayed white after she left.""
Let's look at this one paragraph: "I went upstairs to see breakout sessions where people were being trained for direct confrontations with ICE. Inside a classroom, several dozen people ranging in age from 14 to about 70 faced off against three trainers playing ICE agents, in a loud fracas that lasted several minutes. Afterward, the trainers offered the volunteers a critique. One gray-haired lady said she had found the exercise difficult, “not being a ‘Fuck you’ person.” Others got tips on how to brace themselves more effectively so that the agents could not easily knock them down..."
ReplyDeleteI've been in protests with "fuck you people" and I can't wait to get away from them. I see no value in antagonizing law enforcement personnel or inciting a "loud fracas." It's too bad people are being "trained" to do this. No person well educated in non-violent resistance would find this hopeful. Instead it tells me how far we've gone in losing any grip on how to act on principle (assuming one has been clearly defined) in a principled manner. I think there's more of a psychological component than people are likely to admit. We can see how the identities are lining-up.
Please just shut up. These people are putting their bodies on the line to defend democracy, under a real threat of death, and all you can do is criticize their technique. They're not antagonizing anyone, they are defending their community from paid agitators.
DeleteWe can't even agree on the facts. I'm not sure how you define "antagonizing," but I would include blocking cars, spitting on people, insulting people, "direct confrontations" (meaning physically interfering with law enforcement activities), using noise makers to keep people awake at night, etc. No one looks at these actions and thinks the aim is not to enrage law enforcement. To provoke. To create the next "loud fracas." To incite. Of course it is. This is not the way of Gandhi or MLK. Now, you may say these are old men from another time and we now know better. Fine, make that argument. Telling me to "shut up" is a pretty good example of the mentality I'm finding questionable.
DeleteAnd if the residents really believe that the ICE agents are "Nazis" or "Gestapo", and are indiscriminately killing people, why would they allow a 14 year old to be put into the situation? Sounds like they are trying to escalate the situation.
DeleteMarc B, we routinely put 14-year-olds through "active shooter" sessions in their schools to teach them how to respond to those emergencies. What is wrong with educating a 14-year-old on what to do if they are grabbed by an ICE agent (on their way to school or while playing in the street)?
DeleteWho is going to be the first in America to say that "the emperor has no clothes" (or more like "this guy has severe dementia").
ReplyDeleteJob well done Minnesota.
ReplyDeleteI'm fascinated by the rumors they're going to try Philadelphia next. That will not go as peaceful as Mpls/StP - which is what they want. But they failed in MN, so why would they think they can win in Philly - it's twice as large. And much more aggressive. They booed Santa!
@ Crowboy: I don't know what rock you live under, it must be a pleasant peaceful place. It's not the grey-haired not-fuck-you ladies that are causing the fracas. As always, it's the masked dudes doing the antagonizing. And the violence. And the killing. Twelve times now.
I read somewhere there using C2Cl6 ZnCl3.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexachloroethane
From the link:
“Due to its potential pulmonary toxicity,” zinc chloride producing smoke grenades “have been discharged from the armory of most western countries.” HC smoke inhalation can cause severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, and one study found that it can cause permanent liver damage. The chemical is a suspected carcinogen, has effects on the nervous system, and can cause sudden collapse and death at high doses."
"Most Western countries". But apparently, not the US. Good job! Permanent lung damage seems totally reasonable risk for crown control.
of course, when you reframe it to reality, that this isn’t law enforcement on a specific mission and pesky misguided civilians making their workday harder, thus they need crowd control measures, but that this is the paramilitary arm of an authoritarian government doing what they exist for – terrorise the populace into submission and stage an example – the choice of weapon suddenly makes much more sense. lung and liver damage isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.
Deletere crowboy’s rock: it seems not entirely unpopulated underneath there. we had an entire evening’s worth of debate with some rando on a rock climbing chat server i’m on yesterday. despite being proven wrong with evidence every step of the way, he kept insisting similarly counterfactual nonsense that made all outcomes of the murders strictly the fault of the victims. the mental gymnastics were quite impressive, involving a driving maneuver by renee good that brought to mind the copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics.
raphael
the rise of the new confederacy ... the demons will do anything to keep their economic slaves
ReplyDeleteHistorically, the purpose of non-violent resistance was not to antagonize the agents of an unjust system. The purpose was to demonstrate, through intelligently deployed sacrifice, a commitment to justice. For example, the colonization of India was regarded as an injustice by the Indian people. Gandhi’s method was active opposition, through actions like the Salt March, which had a clearly defined purpose and utilized a disciplined, non-violent method–a method that extended respect to the opposition in all its forms. I see none of this in the current ICE protests.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, are ICE protesters clear in their purpose? I can see that their purpose is to interfere with ICE operations. From this I can assume their purpose is to oppose ICE’s paramilitary-style culture or I can assume the purpose is to stop immigration enforcement in general. But without knowing whether it’s one or the other, or both, I’m not sure what it is; these are very different goals. Do the participants know? I think the public is confused and in that confusion there will be tendency, over time, to see the protests as an amorphous mini-rebellion with no sustained meaning. This was the result with BLM. Everything devolves to gesture, and sentiment is registered, without substance.
As to method, is antagonizing ICE (insulting, spitting, blocking cars, using noise makers to keep law enforcement personnel awake, etc.) a non-violent approach? Not according to Gandhi or MLK, but are these men’s views a gold standard by which we must measure methods of resistance in the current moment? I would say it depends on some version of a moral compass, firstly, and secondly what we’re trying to achieve.
I would argue that the moral compass of Gandhi or MLK points away from yelling “FUCK YOU PIGS!” at law enforcement officers. This is not a matter of whether it’s effective as much as whether it’s right. To the question of effectiveness: I have to wonder about the downstream impact of removing goodwill between citizens and law enforcement; that is, what is the cost? To what extent is what is popularly known as “fascism” being fed by those who claim to oppose it? That is, is fascism being fed in feel good moments of rage-venting-resistance while the long game of really working for justice is denied its focal point and denied the evolution inherent in methods built on decency.
I wonder how much protesters really love immigrants; is this their deepest motive? I’m sure there are some who love immigrants and even love the poor. Love the homeless. Love poor white trash. Love the white working class man who’s having trouble paying his rent. But among these protesters, were we able to dive deeply into their motives, my guess is that it’s less about wanting to defend the immigrant and more about wanting to oppose Trump. Or I should say more about a deep and seething hatred of Trump. A kind of hatred with roots beyond Trump. Roots that extend to a deep hatred of the masculine, lending ICE protests gender war intimations.
ReplyDeleteICE personnel are described, literally, as “testosterone” driven on NPR. This sentiment, that ICE is a male force–young men with guns and a racist and misogynistic bent–is widely held. Whether this is a reasonable characterization or not, the perception holds and makes ICE the enemy of a certain kind of person, with or without immigration as an issue. Who is this person? ICE is the enemy of the white, middle class feminist who is spectacularly pissed-off about the presidential election of 2024. This same middle class feminist sees the election of 2024 as more evidence that the United States is a misogynistic nation, a nation of male oppressors–with Trump as Exhibit A. The “FUCK YOU!” to ICE is a fuck you to all that has led this middle class woman to feeling aggrieved. Why not spit on those boys in camo? Why not find a sudden love of the immigrant if this will facilitate No Kings, I Hate Fucking Trump, 2.0. If the immigrant cause can act as the vehicle for expressing rage at Trump, men and masculinity with the cover of some kind of demand for justice, selective as it is, it makes sense that energy will flow in this direction.
The white middle class and upper class feminist sees no advantage in finding solidarity with poor and working class men and their families: notice that all talk of "intersectionality" leaves those people out–that is, many millions of poor and near-poor white families. In this environment, there’s no way to achieve solidarity within the working class. The left remains rudderless in the United States. We’re a country that can muster a women’s march or even an immigrant’s march, but not a poor people’s march–not the sort MLK envisioned, or any other sort. To find solidarity with poor white people would be to betray identity ideology and its pseudo-religion, a religion complete with unquestionable dogma. ICE protests may give people hope. I’m more inclined to question motives and methods.