That democracy can be a vehicle for
tyranny was well understood by earlier generations of liberal thinkers.
From Benjamin Constant, Alexis de Tocqueville, and John Stuart Mill
through to Isaiah Berlin, it was recognized that democracy does not
necessarily protect individual freedoms. The greatest danger for these
liberals was not that the historical movement toward democracy would be
reversed, but rather the potential ascendancy of an illiberal type of
democracy — a development they saw prefigured in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s
theory of the general will. Legal and constitutional protections have
little force when majorities are indifferent or hostile to liberal
values. Because democratic regimes can claim a source of legitimacy that
other forms of government lack, liberty might be more threatened in the
future than in the past. Most human beings, most of the time, care
about other things more than they care about being free. Many will vote
readily for an illiberal government if it promises security against
violence or hardship, protects a way of life to which they are attached,
and denies freedom to people they hate.
Today these ideas belong in the category of forbidden thoughts. When
democracy proves to be oppressive, liberals insist it is because
democracy is not working properly — if there were genuine popular
participation, majorities would not oppress minorities. Arguing with
this view is pointless, since it rests on an article of faith: the
conviction that freedom is the natural human condition, which tyranny
suppresses. But the mere absence of tyranny may allow no more than
anarchy; freedom requires a functioning state, with a competent
bureaucracy and a legal system that is not excessively corrupt, together
with a political culture that allows these institutions to work
independently of lawmakers.
In the absence of these conditions, human rights — which are,
fundamentally, legal fictions that are created and enforced by
well-organized states — are meaningless. Such conditions do not exist in
most of the world today and will not exist in many countries for the
foreseeable future, if ever. Where they do exist, they are easily
compromised. Far from being the natural condition of humankind, freedom
is inherently fragile and will always be exceptional.
Liberals in all countries find this prospect intolerable...
An excerpt from the thought-provoking essay
Under Western Eyes, by John Gray.
Thanks for the excerpt, as the original article requires a subscription.
ReplyDelete"In every society, people who covet another man's property exist, but in most cases people learn not to act on this desire or even feel ashamed for entertaining it.[13] In an anarchocapitalist society in particular, anyone acting on such a desire is considered a criminal and is suppressed by physical violence. Under monarchical rule, by contrast, only one person — the king — can act on his desire for another man's property, and it is this that makes him a potential threat. However, because only he can expropriate while everyone else is forbidden to do likewise, a king's every action will be regarded with utmost suspicion.[14] Moreover, the selection of a king is by accident of his noble birth. His only characteristic qualification is his upbringing as a future king and preserver of the dynasty and its possessions. This does not assure that he will not be evil, of course; at the same time, however, it does not preclude that a king might actually be a harmless dilettante or even a decent person.
ReplyDeleteIn distinct contrast, by freeing up entry into government, the Constitution permitted anyone to openly express his desire for other men's property; indeed, owing to the constitutional guarantee of "freedom of speech," everyone is protected in so doing. Moreover, everyone is permitted to act on this desire, provided that he gains entry into government; hence, under the Constitution, everyone becomes a potential threat." - Hans Hermann Hoppe
http://mises.org/library/impossibility-limited-government-and-prospects-second-american-revolution
See Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPx1sC30hK4