11 January 2010

"The only thing we have to fear is fear itself"


I have cited the writings of Salon columnist Glenn Greenwald about a half-dozen times in the past year, presumably a reflection of what some visitors to this blog consider to be my "liberal lefty" viewpoint on human rights and world geopolitics.  Today I'll offer another very extended excerpt, this one from a superb column of his last week on the deleterious effects, not of terrorism, but of the fear of terrorism:

"The citizenry has been trained to expect that our Powerful Daddies and Mommies in government will -- in that most cringe-inducing, child-like formulation -- Keep Us Safe.  Whenever the Government fails to do so, the reaction -- just as we saw this week -- is an ugly combination of petulant, adolescent rage and increasingly unhinged cries that More Be Done to ensure that nothing bad in the world ever happens.  Demands that genuinely inept government officials be held accountable are necessary and wise, but demands that political leaders ensure that we can live in womb-like Absolute Safety are delusional and destructive.  Yet this is what the citizenry screams out every time something threatening happens:  please, take more of our privacy away; monitor more of our communications; ban more of us from flying; engage in rituals to create the illusion of Strength; imprison more people without charges; take more and more control and power so you can Keep Us Safe.

This is what inevitably happens to a citizenry that is fed a steady diet of fear and terror for years.  It regresses into pure childhood.  The 5-year-old laying awake in bed, frightened by monsters in the closet, who then crawls into his parents' bed to feel Protected and Safe, is the same as a citizenry planted in front of the television, petrified by endless imagery of scary Muslim monsters, who then collectively crawl to Government and demand that they take more power and control in order to keep them Protected and Safe….

For a variety of reasons, nobody aids this process more than our establishment media, motivated by their own interests in ratcheting up fear and Terrorism melodrama as high as possible.  The result is a citizenry far more terrorized by our own institutions than foreign Terrorists could ever dream of achieving on their own.  For that reason, a risk that is completely dwarfed by numerous others -- the risk of death from Islamic Terrorism -- dominates our discourse, paralyzes us with fear, leads us to destroy our economic security and eradicate countless lives in more and more foreign wars, and causes us to beg and plead and demand that our political leaders invade more of our privacy, seize more of our freedom, and radically alter the system of government we were supposed to have…

What makes all of this most ironic is that the American Founding was predicated on exactly the opposite mindset.  The Constitution is grounded in the premise that there are other values and priorities more important than mere Safety.  Even though they knew that doing so would help murderers and other dangerous and vile criminals evade capture, the Framers banned the Government from searching homes without probable cause, prohibited compelled self-incrimination, double jeopardy and convictions based on hearsay, and outlawed cruel and unusual punishment.  That's because certain values -- privacy, due process, limiting the potential for abuse of government power -- were more important than mere survival and safety…

These are the calculations that are now virtually impossible to find in our political discourse.  It is fear, and only fear, that predominates…  All in response to this week's single failed terrorist attack, there are -- as always -- hysterical calls that we start more wars, initiate racial profiling, imprison innocent people indefinitely, and torture even more indiscriminately…

What matters most about this blinding fear of Terrorism is not the specific policies that are implemented as a result.  Policies can always be changed.  What matters most is the radical transformation of the national character of the United States.  Reducing the citizenry to a frightened puddle of passivity, hysteria and a child-like expectation of Absolute Safety is irrevocable and far more consequential than any specific new laws.  Fear is always the enabling force of authoritarianism:  the desire to vest unlimited power in political authority in exchange for promises of protection.   This is what I wrote about that back in early 2006 in How Would a Patriot Act?

This isn't exactly new:  many of America's most serious historical transgressions -- the internment of Japanese-Americans, McCarthyite witch hunts, World War I censorship laws, the Alien and Sedition Act -- have been the result of fear-driven, over-reaction to external threats, not under-reaction.  Fear is a degrading toxin, and there's no doubt that it has been the primary fuel over the last decade…"
 
Photo credit: LIFE archives.

11 comments:

  1. Good read. Sounds very similar to Adam Curtis documentaries. You ever see any of them Minnesotastan?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think he's mostly BBC-based so I've not seen much, but I think he was responsible for "The Power of Nightmares," which I'd like to blog someday.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah he's BBC based alright. The Power of Nightmares, The Century of the Self, The Mayfair Set and Pandora's Box are all worth a viewing if you've a couple of hours to spare. I think you can find some on Google video these days

    ReplyDelete
  4. Funny, I don't think of Greenwald as lefty at all. I think of him as quite conservative. He is all about the rule of law, government staying out of the bedroom, and the US maintaining its superpower position through constant demonstration of moral and ethical superiority. Isn't that conservatism?

    ReplyDelete
  5. You said, "presumably a reflection of what some visitors to this blog consider to be my "liberal lefty" viewpoint on human rights and world geopolitics".

    It's funny, I see myself as very consertive Christian, but I couldn't agree more with the article. Seems to me that "government" is taking on a "godlike" aura in our culture, and I find it very sad. We are looking to our governments to keep safe - something many feel is God's job- much as the article uses the parent/child relationship.

    Burlgirl

    ReplyDelete
  6. As Ben Franklin said so aptly: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." If we continue letting the government gain access to every aspect of our lives (we're becoming a nanny state of epic proportions), we deserve neither liberty nor safety.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." And our solutions to scary problems is always technology and never behavior modification!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I'm a conservative, and he sounds pretty good to me here.

    But I think we often try to put viewpoints into neat little boxes, when really they don't fit at all. Plenty of my "conservative" friends would agree that freedom is more important than an imaginary safety. Others (the fearmongers and the fearful) would demand more protection.

    To be truthful though, I haven't met anyone clamoring for more onerous rules, except for in the media and government. Maybe we conservatives and liberals could all unite at some point and drive the "lawmakers" and their lackeys in the media from their positions!

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Mike--As a liberal, I agree, insofar as I think Greenwald way overdoes the fear thing. So much of the squalling is political posturing and media excess. I kind of doubt as many of us are "paralyzed by fear" as he claims. He's not above a bit of posturing himself.

    But he's a very important voice for civil liberties, so I'm glad he's around.

    ReplyDelete
  11. fear of terrorism is kind of a redundant term though isn't it. Terrorism is in itself the instilling of fear, it does not define the acts committed but their intention.

    ReplyDelete